PDA

View Full Version : Gtx 970 & 980



okokoo
09-24-2014, 05:08 AM
Since we're kind of moving into a new architecture it would be nice to hear if someone have picked up one of these cards? From what I've read from tests using GPGPU render in Blender (980) the speed has increased with 18% compared to 780Ti. The 970 is on par with 780Ti. Don't know how the case will be in Bunkspeed but it would be great if this new generation (last one with 28nm) would actually get a better transition than the Fermi-Kepler one did, where there was decreasing efficiency for a long time.

Anyone got some buzz?

Aselert
09-24-2014, 09:37 AM
Good question! I'm curious to see it in the Benchspeed :P

At this time, and what I know is that the drivers are not fully optimized to have a clear vision of performances. By example, on Octane it looks like there is a decline of performances. Not like in Arion, or Cycles (Blender) as you said. Surprise on Bunkspeed! I plan, nevertheless, a small increase of perfs here ;)

haknslash
09-25-2014, 01:11 PM
I'm going to hold out for Pascal cards (if they can deliver what they are saying). We've pretty much hit the ceiling with current cards and manufacturing but I do like some of the features of the 980 for gaming :), just not so much for rendering performance unless looking at power savings (which is impressive for sure). A decent read on the 980 http://www.anandtech.com/show/8526/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-review

david.randle
09-25-2014, 04:25 PM
All - With the jump from Kepler to Pre-Maxwell (K5000 (Kepler) to K5200 (Pre-Maxwell) We are seeing a double in performance for the same pricepoint card. Very impressive. I imagine this will go up with full maxwell chips and further even beyond. Remember, with GPU's, we are at an inflection point in the performance curve.

blitz
09-28-2014, 11:39 PM
All - With the jump from Kepler to Pre-Maxwell (K5000 (Kepler) to K5200 (Pre-Maxwell) We are seeing a double in performance for the same pricepoint card. Very impressive. I imagine this will go up with full maxwell chips and further even beyond. Remember, with GPU's, we are at an inflection point in the performance curve.

I'll believe it when I see it from other users. No offense David, but I got burned when I purchased 2x680's under the advice of your staff that I would see improved rendering times compared to my prior 2x570's. The 570's still out-performed the expensive 680's (at the time) by about 25%.

I'm going to wait for non-biased results from actual users before upgrading my hardware yet again. CUDA cores on the 980's are less than the 780Ti's, and your double performance claim sounds ridiculous.

Why don't you show some graphs or statistics or render times on the benchmark scene to back up your claim?

JohnG
09-29-2014, 04:37 PM
I can understand your scepticism Blitz, I never saw any increase in performance when I switched from a GTX470 to a GTX670 despite having more CUDA cores.

However, from what I've read about the 980, nVidia are claiming a 2x performance per Watt increase over the 680 with less CUDA cores and it seems they've delivered, which would back up what David is saying.
Still it would be nice to get some feedback from Bunkspeed users rather than gamers, as most of the reviews seem to be aimed at them.

Aselert
09-30-2014, 07:08 PM
I think indeed, there is a term confusion for the general public. Nvidia plays on that for a while...
I said-I think now to be experimented enough GPU to say- simply that we should not confuse performance and performance/consumption (efficiency).
I am well aware of it now, especially when Nvidia released the Kepler cards, which compared to Fermi cards are actually more efficient. That is a fact. But are less powerful in pure computing (for many applications in any case). That is a fact too.

It's like if Porsche is comparing the latest Porsche 918 to an old 917 and saying "The 918 is faster than the 917" = this is wrong. In pure speed terms, the older is faster than the new one. Even if the old one consumes 10x more than the new. So the new is really more efficient than the old = this is true. And for someone like us, who seek pure speed (beyond the agreement of the card), the performance/consumption (efficiency) represents not much. Except for the heat, the electricity bill, and the planet respect! ;)

So following this, Kepler to Maxwell will not double the pure performance. Maybe double the efficiency, yes!
In the same idea, I personally not look more the card names, but the chip model, its architecture, the number of cores and their frequency. The rest (naming) is just marketing. I got screwed with the new Kepler architecture, I thought that tripling the number of cores that would triple the performances! I would not do me a second time!

But another aspect, and it is what David was saying too, is the price: Nvidia have done, it's true, a real effort about the price. And what David was saying is that the K5200 is more or less 2 times faster than the K5000, with roughly the same price. And this is very good deal, yes! :p
But when you see, like me, the chips of the 2 cards: you can see that the first is the GK104 and the second the GK110, which are 2 very different chips (like comparing a GTX680 with a Titan). So... logical in a sense to have this performance gap. :)

david.randle
10-02-2014, 02:22 AM
I'll believe it when I see it from other users. No offense David, but I got burned when I purchased 2x680's under the advice of your staff that I would see improved rendering times compared to my prior 2x570's. The 570's still out-performed the expensive 680's (at the time) by about 25%.

I'm going to wait for non-biased results from actual users before upgrading my hardware yet again. CUDA cores on the 980's are less than the 780Ti's, and your double performance claim sounds ridiculous.

Why don't you show some graphs or statistics or render times on the benchmark scene to back up your claim?

Hi Blitz - Attached is a comparison in render time on the publicly available benchmark file.

882
883

column 5 is render time and column 6 is FPS

You can see the render time is less than half when comparing the K5200 and K5000 and FPS is almost double. It looks like this performance trend will continue with subsequent chipsets.

As for your GTX situation, i personally apologize if a recommendation was made with certain claims by a Bunkspeed employee. This would have been done so inadvertently. We never test nor benchmark GTX cards and never will so any advice we could possibly give is based on predictions, assumptions or publicly available data. We will not be held responsible for claims against performance on GTX series cards.

tushar
10-03-2014, 07:33 PM
I just installed a GTX 970 with bunkspeed Pro 2014.5.1017.20683 and it does not work. I can render with CPU alright but with GPU the render queue gets stuck at "Initializing Renderer", background rendering quits with "Connection with the background rendering was unexpectedly lost" and accurate mode gives the error "Renderer argument exception".
I formatted the computer and re-installed windows before posting on this thread. The computer is a Mac pro tower with 2xquadcore xeons and 64bit windows 7 SP1.
Is GTX 970 not supported by bunkspeed yet or am I doing something wrong? Please help.

Aselert
10-06-2014, 03:06 PM
tushar, i think it's simply too early to use Maxwell architecture in Bunkspeed :/
I think it will be supported soon, but commonly, there is a small delay when a new hardware is out.

david.randle
10-06-2014, 08:44 PM
I just installed a GTX 970 with bunkspeed Pro 2014.5.1017.20683 and it does not work. I can render with CPU alright but with GPU the render queue gets stuck at "Initializing Renderer", background rendering quits with "Connection with the background rendering was unexpectedly lost" and accurate mode gives the error "Renderer argument exception".
I formatted the computer and re-installed windows before posting on this thread. The computer is a Mac pro tower with 2xquadcore xeons and 64bit windows 7 SP1.
Is GTX 970 not supported by bunkspeed yet or am I doing something wrong? Please help.

Tushar - Sorry to hear about this but it doesn't surprise me. I'll see what i can find out from Nvidia but chances are, a new version of iray will be required to support the 900 series cards.

tushar
10-06-2014, 09:56 PM
I guess its time to purchase another card then, I should have researched before getting the 970. I hope iray catches up with the new architecture soon. Thanks for your replies! :)

david.randle
10-08-2014, 12:10 AM
I'm sure it won't be too long. For future reference, the cards that are currently supported are listed here: http://www.bunkspeed.com/software/pro/techspecs

Aselert
10-13-2014, 09:53 AM
Good news for every Kepler's and Maxwell's cards owners!
Since the new IRAY, the performance for the last architectures have been revised upwards. So for Bunkspeed, very soon, the new Kepler & Maxwell chips should be operated at fair performance!

http://www.migenius.com/products/nvidia-iray/iray-benchmarks-2014-5

Aselert
10-16-2014, 09:00 PM
Anybody have some news about the 8Gb's Gtx970 & 980? I saw it was rumored but nothing since the official launch of the 4Gb versions...

okokoo
10-17-2014, 09:18 PM
Planning to get myself one more rig so I hope the new architecture is working soon. 4x 980s would be smooth ;-)
Didn't know they planned a 8gb version. Would be nice thou.

WBDe
10-30-2014, 06:30 PM
Hi Guys.
Does anyone have an estimate when the new GTX 980's will be supported by bunkspeed iray? I can't seem to find it in the forum but I'm pretty sure I read somewhere a member got a 980 and it doesn't yet work with Bunkspeed? Just asking as I'm in the process of specifying hardware for several new machines.
Thanks

david.randle
10-31-2014, 08:17 PM
Looks like the soonest we will be able to support full Maxwell based cards will be end of Q1 in 2015 with our 2015 Version.

WBDe
11-03-2014, 05:08 PM
Thanks for the ETA David. Looks like GTX 780Ti will be our go to cards for now.

pipistrello
08-23-2015, 08:37 AM
Hi !

I've bought 2 cards 980 gtx but is unsupported yet.

News for support?

Thanks in advance.

david.randle
08-24-2015, 09:23 PM
Hi All - There was a typo in my response 2015 should be 2016. With BETA available Q4 of 2015.

Vicky
12-09-2015, 06:07 PM
I bought myself GTX 980Ti hoping it will work smooth. But it seems like it isn't supported yet? I have bunkspeed pro. What are the news on the support?

david.randle
12-14-2015, 01:46 PM
Vicky -

SOLIDWORKS Visualize, which replaces Bunkspeed will support the Maxwell based Nvidia GPUs. It becomes available early Feb 2016 and is in BETA now.

mattb.351
01-12-2016, 10:21 PM
Vicky -

SOLIDWORKS Visualize, which replaces Bunkspeed will support the Maxwell based Nvidia GPUs. It becomes available early Feb 2016 and is in BETA now.


Will they be supported the day it's released, or are they supported in Beta now? I have Visualize beta and I am buying a new graphics card soon. I would like to go with the GTX 970 as my machine is two years old and I don't want to spend too much on it, but the M4000 Quadro is supported in Solidworks as well.

okokoo
01-14-2016, 05:47 AM
Will they be supported the day it's released, or are they supported in Beta now?

I run with 2x 980 Ti cards in Beta, works like a charm.